1{2 "baseline_n_verified": 4,3 "baseline_unverifiable_references": [4 "R3"5 ],6 "data_issues": [7 {8 "handling": "Used Table 6 (main results table, the one the citation reproduces); the 5% significance holds under either SE (0.431/0.218 = 1.98). Finding judged supported; discrepancy noted.",9 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 (R1): Table A19 prints SE (0.218) for the CS-DR 5 km ATT -0.431 whose SE is (0.210) in Table 6; Table A19 note says 640 never-treated regions while its body and Tables 6-7 say 608."10 },11 {12 "handling": "Not part of the cited finding; recorded only.",13 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 (R1): abstract says fatal outcomes fall by 35% whereas Section 6.1 says approximately 30% (Table 7 fatal 5 km coefficient -0.354)."14 },15 {16 "handling": "The cited value matches the printed cell exactly, so the finding is judged supported per the task rule ('stated in the extract'); the reliability of that SE is flagged as an open issue.",17 "issue": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 (R4): Table 2 SE of the own-wage elasticity (0.091) is identical to the SE of 'Affected employment', although the elasticity is the ratio -0.268/0.366; a ratio's SE equal to the numerator's SE is implausible and may be a typesetting duplication."18 },19 {20 "handling": "Different outcome definitions (count vs binary indicator) per Section 4.1; citation explicitly refers to the preferred specification of the binary outcome, so Table 3 col (4) decides. Last-digit difference treated as truncation.",21 "issue": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 (R5): abstract headline (0.0855, 18.79%, mean 0.455, from omitted Table 2) differs from the Table 3 preferred estimate (0.0962, 36.85%, mean 0.261); Table 3 '% Change' -0.3685 vs -0.0962/0.261 = -0.36858; footnote markers rendered as '^9^9 9'."22 },23 {24 "handling": "Relied on the editor's declared column order; no numbers affected.",25 "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 (R2): Tables 2-3 re-set by the extract editor; 'p ¡ 0.001' rendering defect. arxiv-2603.03260v2 (R3): Table 3 header row garbled."26 }27 ],28 "feasibility": "complete",29 "feasibility_reason": null,30 "n_analysed": 5,31 "n_input_rows": {32 "README.md": 17,33 "reference_list.json": 5,34 "sources/arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt": 66,35 "sources/arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt": 91,36 "sources/arxiv-2603.03260v2.txt": 107,37 "sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58,38 "sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 13439 },40 "n_verified": 4,41 "random_seed": null,42 "reference_checks": {43 "R1": {44 "finding_supported": true,45 "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6, row ATT (SE row and % change row), column 5 km; abstract; Section 6 text after Table 6",46 "note": "Title and year match; Table 6 5 km column prints ATT -0.431** (0.210), -35.0%, significant at 5%, staggered DiD on individual-level Swiss hospital records, as cited (Table A19 prints SE 0.218 for the same estimate, which does not change the 5% significance).",47 "title_matches": true,48 "year_matches": true49 },50 "R2": {51 "finding_supported": true,52 "locator": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2, column 'Average treatment effect estimate', rows Wage, Reemployment, Weeks on UI; abstract (N = 23,549, preregistered RCT)",53 "note": "Title and year match; Table 2 ATE column gives $1,153 (95% CI [166, 2,141]), 1.47 pp and -1.99 weeks, and the abstract states a preregistered RCT with N = 23,549, exactly as cited.",54 "title_matches": true,55 "year_matches": true56 },57 "R3": {58 "finding_supported": false,59 "locator": "arxiv-2603.03260v2 | Section 3.2 'Headline dynamic pattern' (stacked coefficients by tau) and Table 3, row 'Clean-onset threshold-2', columns tau=4 and tau=5",60 "note": "Title differs entirely and 2024 matches neither 2026 submission; the extract reports ~0.5% at the event year (0.005 at tau=0) rising gradually to 3.4-3.7% by years four-five (0.037, 0.034), contradicting the cited immediate jump with no later appreciation.",61 "title_matches": false,62 "year_matches": false63 },64 "R4": {65 "finding_supported": true,66 "locator": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 | Appendix A.1, Table 2, rows 'Employment elasticity w.r.t MW' and 'Emp. elasticity w.r.t affected wage' (Estimate (SE) column)",67 "note": "Title matches and 2025 equals the v1 year; Table 2 prints -0.388 (0.132) and -0.732 (0.091) for Japan's spot labour market, as cited (the 0.091 SE duplicates the 'Affected employment' SE, flagged as a source issue).",68 "title_matches": true,69 "year_matches": true70 },71 "R5": {72 "finding_supported": true,73 "locator": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 | Table 3, column (4), rows Treatment (SE), % Change, Mean Dep. Var.; Section 4.1 text ('most preferred specification (Column (4))')",74 "note": "Title matches and 2025 equals the submission year; Table 3 column (4) gives -0.0962 (0.0129) on infant death or stillbirth, -36.85% relative to the mean 0.261 (preferred specification), as cited.",75 "title_matches": true,76 "year_matches": true77 }78 },79 "task_id": "F4-conf-04",80 "unverifiable_references": [81 "R3"82 ]83}