1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"Table 6 reports a 5 km DCR ATT of -0.431 (SE 0.210, significant at 5%) on log drug-related hospitalisation rates, with 17,250 observations; the 3 km ATT is -0.283 (SE 0.279).","results_keys":["dcr_att_5km","dcr_att_5km_se","dcr_att_3km","dcr_att_3km_se","dcr_obs_5km"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Appendix Table A19 prints SE 0.218 for the same estimate; Table 6 used per key definition."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"Under a normal 1.96 convention, the 95% CI of the Table 6 5 km ATT is [-0.8426, -0.0194].","results_keys":["dcr_att_5km_ci_low","dcr_att_5km_ci_high"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Derived, not printed; assumes asymptotic normality and uses the Table 6 SE."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"Table 7 reports Narcotics 3 km ATT 0.549 (0.187)***, fatal 1 km ATT -1.207 (0.137)***, HIV 5 km ATT -0.340 (0.294) without significance stars.","results_keys":["dcr_narcotics_att_3km","dcr_narcotics_att_3km_se","dcr_fatal_att_1km","dcr_fatal_att_1km_se","dcr_hiv_att_5km","dcr_hiv_att_5km_se","dcr_hiv_att_5km_significant_10pct"],"status":"supported","caveat":"1 km estimates rest on one treated region per cohort (source note)."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"The exact p-value of the HIV 5 km ATT is not reported in the DCR source.","results_keys":["dcr_hiv_att_5km_p_value"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Only significance stars are printed."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"RESEA Table 2 reports a wage ATE of $1,153 (95% CI [166, 2,141]) against a control mean of $33,043; no standard error is printed; the implied SE is 503.83 USD/yr.","results_keys":["ri_wage_ate","ri_wage_ate_ci_low","ri_wage_ate_ci_high","ri_wage_ate_se_reported","ri_wage_ate_se_derived","ri_control_mean_wage"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Derived SE assumes a symmetric Wald interval with critical value 1.96."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"RESEA Table 2 reports a reemployment ATE of 1.47 pp and a weeks-on-UI ATE of -1.99 weeks (95% CI [-2.24, -1.75]).","results_keys":["ri_reemployment_ate_pp","ri_weeks_ui_ate","ri_weeks_ui_ate_ci_low","ri_weeks_ui_ate_ci_high"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Text of the paper states the weeks CI as positive magnitudes; Table 2 signs used."}8]9