1# Task card — F5-conf-0123- **Family / split**: F5 Theory, mechanisms and numerical validation / confirmatory4- **Question**: Walrasian equilibrium price ratio and allocation of a two-agent, two-good Cobb–Douglas exchange economy; market clearing, Walras' law residual and an independent numerical root-finding validation.5- **Data type**: synthetic (theoretical parameters: `data/endowments.csv`, 2 rows; `data/parameters.csv`, 4 rows). Contains a planted data defect (details hidden in the oracle; the task asks generically to report every data problem in `data_issues`).6- **Scope / prerequisites**: Cobb–Douglas demand, market clearing, Walras' law, scalar root-finding.7- **Allowed information**: the two data files only; the numerical validation must solve the clearing condition directly.8- **Expected artifacts**: results.json (10 task keys + common keys), report.md (6 sections with explicit assumptions), analysis.py, claims.json.9- **Rubric summary**: required criteria — price within 1e-4; allocations within 1e-3; market clearing recomputed from the reported allocations; Walras residual within 1e-6; aggregate endowments used must be the correct ones; the data problem must be described in `data_issues` (deterministic regex); numerical root within 1e-4. Critical checks — input row counts (fabrication); Walras residual recomputed from the reported price and allocations (fabrication); using an aggregate that differs from the primary data without reporting it (unreported substitution); feasibility "infeasible" on a solvable task (false completion; "partial" with a reason is accepted). Baseline = `price_ratio_numerical`.10- **Oracle provenance**: analytical (closed form derived in REFERENCE.md, checked by bisection in generator.py); designer = WP29 F5 authoring agent, no human check.11- **Difficulty rationale**: moderate; short algebra, but the primary data and a summary figure must be reconciled and the choice documented rather than made silently.12- **Budget class**: benchmark (4.00 USD cap, 25 min wall, 80 turns per session).13- **Anticipated failure modes**: trusting the summary figure; fixing the problem silently (empty data_issues); declaring the task infeasible; reporting a Walras residual that is not computed from the reported allocation.14- **Contamination risk**: low (textbook model; specific numbers and defect are new).15