1{2 "document_id": "syn_02006_2000",3 "family": "synthetic",4 "split": "dev",5 "text": "INTERNAL LEDGER MEMO — Capital Projects Register, issue 987. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later date supersedes the earlier one. Projects listed under 'proposals under review' have no recorded attributes in this issue.\n\nProposals under review (no attributes recorded): Drazenker-20, Novnak-19, Volymifel-4.\n\nProject Drazenker-18 was proposed by Nnamdi Ouellet-Marchand on 21 February 2034 with an initial budget of 4,311,894 CAD. On 24 March 2034 the budget of Drazenker-18 was revised to 3,833,425 CAD. On 8 July 2034 the budget of Drazenker-18 was revised to 4,216,925 CAD. The approved decision for Drazenker-18 was recorded on 31 August 2034. The site of Drazenker-18 is Lot 144-F in Val-d'Or. The supplier identifier for Drazenker-18 is WP-95V-4221. Drazenker-18 was cancelled; it was not postponed. The rated capacity of Drazenker-18 is 25.85 t. The calibration constant filed for Drazenker-18 is 87.2165.\n\nContingency reserves may only be released with written approval from the finance director. Printed copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. All timestamps in this ledger are recorded in local time at the head office. Health and safety briefings are mandatory for all visitors before entering an active site. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later timestamp supersedes the earlier one. Quarterly reviews are held on the second Tuesday of the month following the quarter end.\n\nProject Novnak-18 was proposed by Zéphyrine Okonkwo on 20 November 2032 with an initial budget of 9,017,863 CAD. On 16 March 2033 the budget of Novnak-18 was revised to 9,356,570 CAD. On 10 June 2033 the budget of Novnak-18 was revised to 10,592,075 CAD. The rejected decision for Novnak-18 was recorded on 23 July 2033. The site of Novnak-18 is Lot 735-V in Fermont. The supplier identifier for Novnak-18 is HZ-85G-3390. Novnak-18 was cancelled; it was not postponed. The rated capacity of Novnak-18 is 22.38 MW. The calibration constant filed for Novnak-18 is 37.0357.\n\nTravel reimbursements require original receipts and a signed itinerary. Vendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Printed copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails. Contingency reserves may only be released with written approval from the finance director. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later timestamp supersedes the earlier one. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. All timestamps in this ledger are recorded in local time at the head office.\n\nProject Volymifel-3 was proposed by Bohdan Delacroix on 2 March 2034 with an initial budget of 2,235,072 NOK. On 8 May 2034 the budget of Volymifel-3 was revised to 2,431,725 NOK. On 3 July 2034 the budget of Volymifel-3 was revised to 1,837,420 NOK. The approved decision for Volymifel-3 was recorded on 20 August 2034. The site of Volymifel-3 is Lot 526-K in Chibougamau. The supplier identifier for Volymifel-3 is XS-57D-3861. Volymifel-3 remains on schedule and was neither cancelled nor postponed. The rated capacity of Volymifel-3 is 40.65 t. The calibration constant filed for Volymifel-3 is 63.3690.\n\nMinutes are circulated within five business days and approved at the following meeting. Vendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. Printed copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails. Capital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Printed copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails.\n\nProject Lithpragam-8 was proposed by Rasheed Kirchhoff on 13 October 2031 with an initial budget of 8,338,875 CAD. On 7 November 2031 the budget of Lithpragam-8 was revised to 9,095,085 CAD. On 8 December 2031 the budget of Lithpragam-8 was revised to 8,133,345 CAD. The approved decision for Lithpragam-8 was recorded on 19 January 2032. The site of Lithpragam-8 is Lot 506-B in Fermont. The supplier identifier for Lithpragam-8 is KG-41G-2874. Lithpragam-8 remains on schedule and was neither cancelled nor postponed. The rated capacity of Lithpragam-8 is 12.9 km. The calibration constant filed for Lithpragam-8 is 8.2151.\n\nThe committee reiterates that all figures are reported in nominal terms unless otherwise stated. All timestamps in this ledger are recorded in local time at the head office. Contingency reserves may only be released with written approval from the finance director. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Printed copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years.\n\nProject Urdragam-6 was proposed by Dagny Lindqvist on 19 June 2030 with an initial budget of 1,471,200 USD. The rejected decision for Urdragam-6 was recorded on 1 July 2030. The site of Urdragam-6 is Lot 485-Z in Matagami. The supplier identifier for Urdragam-6 is KL-39W-9729. Urdragam-6 was NOT cancelled; its launch was postponed to 23 December 2030. The rated capacity of Urdragam-6 is 23.88 MW. The calibration constant filed for Urdragam-6 is 22.5043.\n\nSite access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. Vendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Vendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Travel reimbursements require original receipts and a signed itinerary. Vendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion.\n\nProject Ardardmel-13 was proposed by Rasheed Achterberg on 14 February 2031 with an initial budget of 2,436,275 CAD. On 11 April 2031 the budget of Ardardmel-13 was revised to 2,710,825 CAD. On 8 May 2031 the budget of Ardardmel-13 was revised to 2,199,195 CAD. The rejected decision for Ardardmel-13 was recorded on 13 May 2031. The site of Ardardmel-13 is Lot 735-L in La Tuque. The supplier identifier for Ardardmel-13 is CS-78T-6256. Ardardmel-13 was cancelled; it was not postponed. The rated capacity of Ardardmel-13 is 6.23 t. The calibration constant filed for Ardardmel-13 is 31.6625.\n\nProject codes follow the pattern of a name, a hyphen and a sequence number. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later timestamp supersedes the earlier one. All timestamps in this ledger are recorded in local time at the head office. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later timestamp supersedes the earlier one. Quarterly reviews are held on the second Tuesday of the month following the quarter end. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Project codes follow the pattern of a name, a hyphen and a sequence number.",6 "char_len": 7402,7 "document_hash": "fe6d5d7c5ffa3ddfdaf46c3cca5a6b9f51c19c0e9987b820daf4e669ad1b48c1",8 "questions": [9 {10 "question_id": "q00_single_fact",11 "qtype": "single_fact",12 "question": "What is the supplier identifier for Urdragam-6?"13 },14 {15 "question_id": "q01_single_fact",16 "qtype": "single_fact",17 "question": "Where is the site of Lithpragam-8? Give the lot and the town."18 },19 {20 "question_id": "q02_exact_copy",21 "qtype": "exact_copy",22 "question": "What is the calibration constant filed for Novnak-18? Copy it exactly."23 },24 {25 "question_id": "q03_exact_copy",26 "qtype": "exact_copy",27 "question": "Who proposed Drazenker-18? Give the full name."28 },29 {30 "question_id": "q04_multi_hop",31 "qtype": "multi_hop",32 "question": "What was the initial budget, in CAD, of the project proposed by Rasheed Achterberg?"33 },34 {35 "question_id": "q05_multi_hop",36 "qtype": "multi_hop",37 "question": "What is the supplier identifier of the project whose site is Lot 526-K in Chibougamau?"38 },39 {40 "question_id": "q06_negation",41 "qtype": "negation",42 "question": "Was Urdragam-6 cancelled? Answer yes or no."43 },44 {45 "question_id": "q07_negation",46 "qtype": "negation",47 "question": "Was Novnak-18 postponed? Answer yes or no."48 },49 {50 "question_id": "q08_revision",51 "qtype": "revision",52 "question": "According to the ledger's precedence rule, what is the current budget of Volymifel-3, in NOK? Give the number only."53 },54 {55 "question_id": "q09_revision",56 "qtype": "revision",57 "question": "What was the first revised budget of Drazenker-18, in CAD? Give the number only."58 },59 {60 "question_id": "q10_temporal",61 "qtype": "temporal",62 "question": "Which decision was recorded first: the one for Urdragam-6 or the one for Lithpragam-8? Answer with the project code."63 },64 {65 "question_id": "q11_aggregation",66 "qtype": "aggregation",67 "question": "What is the total of the initial budgets of all projects whose budget is denominated in CAD? Give the number only."68 },69 {70 "question_id": "q12_unit_conversion",71 "qtype": "unit_conversion",72 "question": "What is the rated capacity of Urdragam-6 expressed in kW? Give the number only."73 },74 {75 "question_id": "q13_unanswerable",76 "qtype": "unanswerable",77 "question": "What is the supplier identifier for Drazenker-20? If the document does not say, answer exactly: unknown."78 },79 {80 "question_id": "q14_unanswerable",81 "qtype": "unanswerable",82 "question": "What is the postal code of the head office that issued this ledger? If the document does not say, answer exactly: unknown."83 }84 ]85}