SPB Git

spb/wp30_uqo

Public
10.0 KB · 85 lines json
1{2  "document_id": "syn_02015_2000",3  "family": "synthetic",4  "split": "dev",5  "text": "INTERNAL LEDGER MEMO — Capital Projects Register, issue 924. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later date supersedes the earlier one. Projects listed under 'proposals under review' have no recorded attributes in this issue.\n\nProposals under review (no attributes recorded): Lithban-5, Melnakdra-6, Rukvarix-13.\n\nProject Lithban-3 was proposed by Aurelio Zelenko on 14 September 2034 with an initial budget of 2,457,275 CAD. On 25 December 2034 the budget of Lithban-3 was revised to 2,322,935 CAD. On 14 March 2035 the budget of Lithban-3 was revised to 2,581,135 CAD. The rejected decision for Lithban-3 was recorded on 24 March 2035. The site of Lithban-3 is Lot 915-A in Lebel-sur-Quévillon. The supplier identifier for Lithban-3 is ED-63X-2951. Lithban-3 was cancelled; it was not postponed. The rated capacity of Lithban-3 is 43.5 ha. The calibration constant filed for Lithban-3 is 65.9103.\n\nSite access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. The committee reiterates that all figures are reported in nominal terms unless otherwise stated. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. The internal audit function reports to the governance board and not to project leads. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. Capital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system.\n\nProject Melnakdra-5 was proposed by Rasheed Tremblay-Côté on 12 June 2034 with an initial budget of 4,738,800 CHF. The approved decision for Melnakdra-5 was recorded on 11 July 2034. The site of Melnakdra-5 is Lot 431-D in Chibougamau. The supplier identifier for Melnakdra-5 is ZK-47S-3143. Melnakdra-5 remains on schedule and was neither cancelled nor postponed. The rated capacity of Melnakdra-5 is 43.2 MW. The calibration constant filed for Melnakdra-5 is 47.8263.\n\nSite access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. All timestamps in this ledger are recorded in local time at the head office. Capital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. Capital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. Project codes follow the pattern of a name, a hyphen and a sequence number. All timestamps in this ledger are recorded in local time at the head office.\n\nProject Rukvarix-8 was proposed by Ludivine Mbeki on 12 August 2030 with an initial budget of 6,166,785 CAD. The approved decision for Rukvarix-8 was recorded on 31 August 2030. The site of Rukvarix-8 is Lot 856-N in Témiscaming. The supplier identifier for Rukvarix-8 is MJ-67H-9424. Rukvarix-8 was cancelled; it was not postponed. The rated capacity of Rukvarix-8 is 29.0 km. The calibration constant filed for Rukvarix-8 is 53.6134.\n\nAll timestamps in this ledger are recorded in local time at the head office. Vendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Vendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later timestamp supersedes the earlier one. Travel reimbursements require original receipts and a signed itinerary. Capital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later timestamp supersedes the earlier one.\n\nProject Urdramun-18 was proposed by Ingrid Rousseau on 1 February 2033 with an initial budget of 7,352,345 CAD. On 5 March 2033 the budget of Urdramun-18 was revised to 6,075,080 CAD. On 12 March 2033 the budget of Urdramun-18 was revised to 6,848,010 CAD. The approved decision for Urdramun-18 was recorded on 3 May 2033. The site of Urdramun-18 is Lot 375-K in Gaspé. The supplier identifier for Urdramun-18 is TB-51T-2125. Urdramun-18 was cancelled; it was not postponed. The rated capacity of Urdramun-18 is 28.21 MW. The calibration constant filed for Urdramun-18 is 60.2010.\n\nCapital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. Contingency reserves may only be released with written approval from the finance director. Vendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Travel reimbursements require original receipts and a signed itinerary. Health and safety briefings are mandatory for all visitors before entering an active site. Contingency reserves may only be released with written approval from the finance director. Minutes are circulated within five business days and approved at the following meeting.\n\nProject Lithlithlun-1 was proposed by Ewan Obuya on 23 March 2031 with an initial budget of 6,777,515 EUR. On 7 July 2031 the budget of Lithlithlun-1 was revised to 7,607,770 EUR. On 18 August 2031 the budget of Lithlithlun-1 was revised to 7,223,680 EUR. The rejected decision for Lithlithlun-1 was recorded on 22 August 2031. The site of Lithlithlun-1 is Lot 804-E in Lebel-sur-Quévillon. The supplier identifier for Lithlithlun-1 is GV-23Q-5166. Lithlithlun-1 was NOT cancelled; its launch was postponed to 28 March 2032. The rated capacity of Lithlithlun-1 is 3.19 ha. The calibration constant filed for Lithlithlun-1 is 5.8929.\n\nCapital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. Project codes follow the pattern of a name, a hyphen and a sequence number. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. Printed copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails. Procurement follows the standard three-quote rule for purchases above the departmental threshold. The internal audit function reports to the governance board and not to project leads.\n\nProject Wenurpra-16 was proposed by Zéphyrine Qvistrand on 14 June 2029 with an initial budget of 7,338,688 CAD. On 20 September 2029 the budget of Wenurpra-16 was revised to 7,309,345 CAD. On 7 November 2029 the budget of Wenurpra-16 was revised to 7,528,775 CAD. The rejected decision for Wenurpra-16 was recorded on 16 November 2029. The site of Wenurpra-16 is Lot 962-R in Gaspé. The supplier identifier for Wenurpra-16 is AW-83B-1705. Wenurpra-16 was NOT cancelled; its launch was postponed to 20 September 2030. The rated capacity of Wenurpra-16 is 8.4 t. The calibration constant filed for Wenurpra-16 is 35.3856.\n\nQuarterly reviews are held on the second Tuesday of the month following the quarter end. Vendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Printed copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails. Travel reimbursements require original receipts and a signed itinerary. The committee reiterates that all figures are reported in nominal terms unless otherwise stated. Health and safety briefings are mandatory for all visitors before entering an active site. Procurement follows the standard three-quote rule for purchases above the departmental threshold.",6  "char_len": 7261,7  "document_hash": "978bd93c8e6c25a5c60e31917ef30781be795fba6c3ba8294d72e3820216683d",8  "questions": [9    {10      "question_id": "q00_single_fact",11      "qtype": "single_fact",12      "question": "What is the supplier identifier for Urdramun-18?"13    },14    {15      "question_id": "q01_single_fact",16      "qtype": "single_fact",17      "question": "Where is the site of Lithban-3? Give the lot and the town."18    },19    {20      "question_id": "q02_exact_copy",21      "qtype": "exact_copy",22      "question": "What is the calibration constant filed for Rukvarix-8? Copy it exactly."23    },24    {25      "question_id": "q03_exact_copy",26      "qtype": "exact_copy",27      "question": "Who proposed Melnakdra-5? Give the full name."28    },29    {30      "question_id": "q04_multi_hop",31      "qtype": "multi_hop",32      "question": "What was the initial budget, in EUR, of the project proposed by Ewan Obuya?"33    },34    {35      "question_id": "q05_multi_hop",36      "qtype": "multi_hop",37      "question": "What is the supplier identifier of the project whose site is Lot 962-R in Gaspé?"38    },39    {40      "question_id": "q06_negation",41      "qtype": "negation",42      "question": "Was Wenurpra-16 cancelled? Answer yes or no."43    },44    {45      "question_id": "q07_negation",46      "qtype": "negation",47      "question": "Was Lithban-3 postponed? Answer yes or no."48    },49    {50      "question_id": "q08_revision",51      "qtype": "revision",52      "question": "According to the ledger's precedence rule, what is the current budget of Lithban-3, in CAD? Give the number only."53    },54    {55      "question_id": "q09_revision",56      "qtype": "revision",57      "question": "What was the first revised budget of Lithban-3, in CAD? Give the number only."58    },59    {60      "question_id": "q10_temporal",61      "qtype": "temporal",62      "question": "Which decision was recorded first: the one for Urdramun-18 or the one for Lithban-3? Answer with the project code."63    },64    {65      "question_id": "q11_aggregation",66      "qtype": "aggregation",67      "question": "What is the total of the initial budgets of all projects whose budget is denominated in CAD? Give the number only."68    },69    {70      "question_id": "q12_unit_conversion",71      "qtype": "unit_conversion",72      "question": "What is the rated capacity of Urdramun-18 expressed in kW? Give the number only."73    },74    {75      "question_id": "q13_unanswerable",76      "qtype": "unanswerable",77      "question": "What is the supplier identifier for Lithban-5? If the document does not say, answer exactly: unknown."78    },79    {80      "question_id": "q14_unanswerable",81      "qtype": "unanswerable",82      "question": "What is the postal code of the head office that issued this ledger? If the document does not say, answer exactly: unknown."83    }84  ]85}
Files · 53ae960640251cd8de4e48bd47b17d011ba87dbe
Menu

Theme