1{2 "document_id": "syn_03027_2000",3 "family": "synthetic",4 "split": "test",5 "text": "INTERNAL LEDGER MEMO — Capital Projects Register, issue 680. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later date supersedes the earlier one. Projects listed under 'proposals under review' have no recorded attributes in this issue.\n\nProposals under review (no attributes recorded): Sollith-7, Banurlun-13, Lunlith-18.\n\nProject Sollith-4 was proposed by Priyamvada Sørlie on 15 August 2030 with an initial budget of 6,914,937 CAD. On 8 October 2030 the budget of Sollith-4 was revised to 6,056,150 CAD. On 7 January 2031 the budget of Sollith-4 was revised to 8,010,205 CAD. The approved decision for Sollith-4 was recorded on 14 February 2031. The site of Sollith-4 is Lot 596-B in Chibougamau. The supplier identifier for Sollith-4 is WT-26M-9227. Sollith-4 was NOT cancelled; its launch was postponed to 25 May 2031. The rated capacity of Sollith-4 is 14.59 MW. The calibration constant filed for Sollith-4 is 72.7163.\n\nPrinted copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails. The committee reiterates that all figures are reported in nominal terms unless otherwise stated. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Travel reimbursements require original receipts and a signed itinerary. Quarterly reviews are held on the second Tuesday of the month following the quarter end. Printed copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails. The committee reiterates that all figures are reported in nominal terms unless otherwise stated.\n\nProject Banurlun-12 was proposed by Nnamdi Varga on 21 February 2031 with an initial budget of 1,787,610 CAD. On 14 June 2031 the budget of Banurlun-12 was revised to 1,960,300 CAD. On 23 June 2031 the budget of Banurlun-12 was revised to 2,021,900 CAD. The approved decision for Banurlun-12 was recorded on 11 July 2031. The site of Banurlun-12 is Lot 655-W in Gaspé. The supplier identifier for Banurlun-12 is ZZ-20U-3727. Banurlun-12 was cancelled; it was not postponed. The rated capacity of Banurlun-12 is 16.49 t. The calibration constant filed for Banurlun-12 is 15.0054.\n\nPrinted copies of this memo are uncontrolled; the electronic record prevails. The committee reiterates that all figures are reported in nominal terms unless otherwise stated. The internal audit function reports to the governance board and not to project leads. Procurement follows the standard three-quote rule for purchases above the departmental threshold. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Project codes follow the pattern of a name, a hyphen and a sequence number. Procurement follows the standard three-quote rule for purchases above the departmental threshold.\n\nProject Lunlith-13 was proposed by Wilhelmina Ouellet-Marchand on 22 July 2030 with an initial budget of 8,278,225 CAD. On 23 September 2030 the budget of Lunlith-13 was revised to 8,244,865 CAD. The rejected decision for Lunlith-13 was recorded on 17 October 2030. The site of Lunlith-13 is Lot 247-S in Baie-Comeau. The supplier identifier for Lunlith-13 is DD-69N-1957. Lunlith-13 remains on schedule and was neither cancelled nor postponed. The rated capacity of Lunlith-13 is 31.6 ha. The calibration constant filed for Lunlith-13 is 91.4507.\n\nAll timestamps in this ledger are recorded in local time at the head office. Contingency reserves may only be released with written approval from the finance director. Capital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. Project codes follow the pattern of a name, a hyphen and a sequence number. Capital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. All timestamps in this ledger are recorded in local time at the head office. Contingency reserves may only be released with written approval from the finance director.\n\nProject Rukwen-7 was proposed by Ludivine Dubrovnik on 3 December 2032 with an initial budget of 7,321,480 EUR. The rejected decision for Rukwen-7 was recorded on 9 December 2032. The site of Rukwen-7 is Lot 480-B in Fermont. The supplier identifier for Rukwen-7 is DB-72P-3503. Rukwen-7 was NOT cancelled; its launch was postponed to 4 August 2033. The rated capacity of Rukwen-7 is 16.17 km. The calibration constant filed for Rukwen-7 is 82.3622.\n\nVendor onboarding includes a conflict-of-interest declaration and a bank verification letter. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later timestamp supersedes the earlier one. Capital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. Where two entries conflict, the entry with the later timestamp supersedes the earlier one. Minutes are circulated within five business days and approved at the following meeting. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Travel reimbursements require original receipts and a signed itinerary.\n\nProject Draosttis-8 was proposed by Haruki Tremblay-Côté on 11 February 2034 with an initial budget of 535,300 CHF. On 27 February 2034 the budget of Draosttis-8 was revised to 490,385 CHF. On 23 March 2034 the budget of Draosttis-8 was revised to 459,325 CHF. The approved decision for Draosttis-8 was recorded on 22 May 2034. The site of Draosttis-8 is Lot 644-B in Lebel-sur-Quévillon. The supplier identifier for Draosttis-8 is KK-70W-7175. Draosttis-8 was cancelled; it was not postponed. The rated capacity of Draosttis-8 is 17.12 ha. The calibration constant filed for Draosttis-8 is 79.1324.\n\nQuarterly reviews are held on the second Tuesday of the month following the quarter end. Project codes follow the pattern of a name, a hyphen and a sequence number. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Site access badges must be renewed annually and returned on project completion. Health and safety briefings are mandatory for all visitors before entering an active site. The internal audit function reports to the governance board and not to project leads. Contingency reserves may only be released with written approval from the finance director.\n\nProject Novost-15 was proposed by Priyamvada Tremblay-Côté on 3 February 2033 with an initial budget of 663,154 CHF. The rejected decision for Novost-15 was recorded on 25 March 2033. The site of Novost-15 is Lot 455-L in Sept-Îles. The supplier identifier for Novost-15 is RQ-10W-4229. Novost-15 was cancelled; it was not postponed. The rated capacity of Novost-15 is 41.4 ha. The calibration constant filed for Novost-15 is 48.5249.\n\nCapital expenditure is tracked separately from operating costs in the ledger system. The committee reiterates that all figures are reported in nominal terms unless otherwise stated. The internal audit function reports to the governance board and not to project leads. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years. Minutes are circulated within five business days and approved at the following meeting. Contingency reserves may only be released with written approval from the finance director. Environmental monitoring reports are archived by the records office for a period of seven years.",6 "char_len": 7237,7 "document_hash": "10326080979f71b625e4110c7c19767e5a752e267de5034f7e37d98cb6e06249",8 "questions": [9 {10 "question_id": "q00_single_fact",11 "qtype": "single_fact",12 "question": "What is the supplier identifier for Novost-15?"13 },14 {15 "question_id": "q01_single_fact",16 "qtype": "single_fact",17 "question": "Where is the site of Lunlith-13? Give the lot and the town."18 },19 {20 "question_id": "q02_exact_copy",21 "qtype": "exact_copy",22 "question": "What is the calibration constant filed for Banurlun-12? Copy it exactly."23 },24 {25 "question_id": "q03_exact_copy",26 "qtype": "exact_copy",27 "question": "Who proposed Sollith-4? Give the full name."28 },29 {30 "question_id": "q04_multi_hop",31 "qtype": "multi_hop",32 "question": "What was the initial budget, in CHF, of the project proposed by Haruki Tremblay-Côté?"33 },34 {35 "question_id": "q05_multi_hop",36 "qtype": "multi_hop",37 "question": "What is the supplier identifier of the project whose site is Lot 480-B in Fermont?"38 },39 {40 "question_id": "q06_negation",41 "qtype": "negation",42 "question": "Was Rukwen-7 cancelled? Answer yes or no."43 },44 {45 "question_id": "q07_negation",46 "qtype": "negation",47 "question": "Was Banurlun-12 postponed? Answer yes or no."48 },49 {50 "question_id": "q08_revision",51 "qtype": "revision",52 "question": "According to the ledger's precedence rule, what is the current budget of Sollith-4, in CAD? Give the number only."53 },54 {55 "question_id": "q09_revision",56 "qtype": "revision",57 "question": "What was the first revised budget of Sollith-4, in CAD? Give the number only."58 },59 {60 "question_id": "q10_temporal",61 "qtype": "temporal",62 "question": "Which decision was recorded first: the one for Novost-15 or the one for Lunlith-13? Answer with the project code."63 },64 {65 "question_id": "q11_aggregation",66 "qtype": "aggregation",67 "question": "What is the total of the initial budgets of all projects whose budget is denominated in CAD? Give the number only."68 },69 {70 "question_id": "q12_unit_conversion",71 "qtype": "unit_conversion",72 "question": "What is the rated capacity of Novost-15 expressed in m²? Give the number only."73 },74 {75 "question_id": "q13_unanswerable",76 "qtype": "unanswerable",77 "question": "What is the supplier identifier for Sollith-7? If the document does not say, answer exactly: unknown."78 },79 {80 "question_id": "q14_unanswerable",81 "qtype": "unanswerable",82 "question": "What is the postal code of the head office that issued this ledger? If the document does not say, answer exactly: unknown."83 }84 ]85}