1key,doi_or_arxiv,verified_via,verified_title,match,note2page2021prisma,10.1136/bmj.n71,crossref,"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)3page2021prismaee,10.1136/bmj.n160,crossref,"PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews",exact,defined in references_part03.bib4petersen2008mapping,10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8,crossref,"Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)5petersen2015mapping,10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007,crossref,"Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)6tricco2018prismascr,10.7326/M18-0850,crossref,"PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)7rethlefsen2021prismas,10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z,crossref,"PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)8haddaway2022prismaflow,10.1002/cl2.1230,crossref,"PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)9gusenbauer2020search,10.1002/jrsm.1378,crossref,"Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources",exact,defined in references_part03.bib10ley2002dblp,10.1007/3-540-45735-6_1,crossref,"The DBLP Computer Science Bibliography: Evolution, Research Issues, Perspectives",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)11ley2009dblp,10.14778/1687553.1687577,crossref,"DBLP (Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 2(2) 1493-1500; full title 'DBLP: some lessons learned' truncated by Crossref)",minor,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)12ginsparg2011arxiv,10.1038/476145a,crossref,"ArXiv at 20",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)13clement2019arxiv,arXiv:1905.00075,arxiv,"On the Use of ArXiv as a Dataset",exact,defined in references_part03.bib14priem2022openalex,arXiv:2205.01833,arxiv,"OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)15kinney2023s2,arXiv:2301.10140,arxiv,"The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform",exact,defined in references_part03.bib16alperin2024openalex,arXiv:2404.17663,arxiv,"An analysis of the suitability of OpenAlex for bibliometric analyses",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)17culbert2025openalex,10.1007/s11192-025-05293-3,crossref,"Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus",exact,defined in references_part03.bib18scheidsteger2023openalex,10.3145/epi.2023.mar.09,crossref,"Which of the metadata with relevance for bibliometrics are the same and which are different when switching from Microsoft Academic Graph to OpenAlex?",exact,defined in references_part03.bib19delgadoquiros2024completeness,10.1162/qss_a_00286,crossref,"Completeness degree of publication metadata in eight free-access scholarly databases",exact,defined in references_part03.bib20visser2021comparison,10.1162/qss_a_00112,crossref,"Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)21martinmartin2021comparison,10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4,crossref,"Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations",exact,defined in references_part03.bib22mongeon2016coverage,10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5,crossref,"The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis",exact,defined in references_part03.bib23hendricks2020crossref,10.1162/qss_a_00022,crossref,"Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)24wang2020mag,10.1162/qss_a_00021,crossref,"Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)25radev2013acl,10.1007/s10579-012-9211-2,crossref,"The ACL anthology network corpus",exact,defined in references_part03.bib26fellegi1969linkage,10.1080/01621459.1969.10501049,crossref,"A Theory for Record Linkage",exact,defined in references_part03.bib27christen2012matching,10.1007/978-3-642-31164-2,crossref,"Data Matching",exact,defined in references_part03.bib28lin2020preprints,10.1007/s11192-020-03430-8,crossref,"How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXiv",exact,defined in references_part03.bib29cabanac2021preprint,10.1007/s11192-021-03900-7,crossref,"Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links",exact,defined in references_part03.bib30wang2013window,10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9,crossref,"Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation",exact,defined in references_part03.bib31waltman2016review,10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007,crossref,"A review of the literature on citation impact indicators",exact,reused:references.bib (same key and DOI; defined there)32fortunato2018science,10.1126/science.aao0185,crossref,"Science of science",exact,defined in references_part03.bib33nosek2018preregistration,10.1073/pnas.1708274114,crossref,"The preregistration revolution",exact,defined in references_part03.bib34vannoorden2023retractions,10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8,crossref,"More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record",exact,defined in references_part03.bib35