1% generated by tables/make_tables.py from ./results/graph/modularity_yearly.csv2\begin{table}[htbp]\centering\caption{Modularity of the yearly category citation-flow network at the category and area partitions, and the within-category self-share of citations.}\label{tab:p9-modularity}3\begin{threeparttable}\small4\begin{tabular}{lrrrr}5\toprule6\textbf{Year} & \textbf{Internal citations} & \textbf{Q (categories)} & \textbf{Q (areas)} & \textbf{Self-share (\%)} \\7\midrule82018 & 213{,}358 & 0.5428 & 0.5083 & 62.09 \\92019 & 975{,}445 & 0.5510 & 0.5007 & 64.15 \\102020 & 2{,}131{,}658 & 0.5450 & 0.4914 & 63.74 \\112021 & 3{,}556{,}446 & 0.5372 & 0.4789 & 63.36 \\122022 & 4{,}288{,}984 & 0.5356 & 0.4750 & 63.58 \\132023 & 5{,}706{,}569 & 0.5263 & 0.4605 & 62.97 \\142024 & 6{,}799{,}414 & 0.5123 & 0.4595 & 61.83 \\152025 & 7{,}477{,}998 & 0.5059 & 0.4593 & 60.19 \\162026 & 4{,}558{,}848 & 0.5004 & 0.4615 & 58.93 \\17\bottomrule18\end{tabular}19\begin{tablenotes}\footnotesize\item Equation~\eqref{eq:modularity} at the fixed partitions; the citation counts are internal references of works of the citing year whose two ends have a primary category. The 2018 network is small because few cited works of 2018 or later existed; 2026 is incomplete.\end{tablenotes}20\end{threeparttable}\end{table}21