1---2description: Produce a referee-style review of a manuscript (roles: referee, editor, table_editor, integrity, replication)3argument-hint: <paper-path> [--role referee|editor|table_editor|integrity|replication] [--full]4allowed-tools: Bash(/Users/simon-pierreboucher/Desktop/UQO/Recherche/Recherche-UQO/methodes/wp45-jof250/.venv/bin/jof250:*), Bash(ls:*), Bash(cat:*), Bash(mkdir:*), Read, Glob, Grep5---6Parse `$ARGUMENTS` as `<paper-path> [--role R] [--full]` (default role referee). If `--full`, run roles referee, editor, table_editor, integrity and replication in sequence. For each: `/Users/simon-pierreboucher/Desktop/UQO/Recherche/Recherche-UQO/methodes/wp45-jof250/.venv/bin/jof250 review --paper <path> --role <R> --output <paper-path>/jof250_reviews/<R>_<date>.md`. Then read each report and give the user a prioritized synthesis (major issues first), keeping every number as written. Do not modify the manuscript.7