SPB Git

spb/wp45_uqo

Public
6.4 KB · 221 lines json
1{2 "validation_errors": [],3 "doc_id": "jof_12834",4 "ontology_version": "1.0",5 "prompt_version": "1.0",6 "model": "claude-opus-5-5",7 "effort": "medium",8 "annotated_at": "2026-11-03T23:11:40+00:00",9 "source_sha256": "d8812a99c1cfac8df8e9180a4db4c03a11667543f6689ba281b718b603a1d06b",10 "parser": "pymupdf-jof-heuristics-1.3",11 "payload_chars": 9321,12 "usage": {13  "input": 3306,14  "output": 1692,15  "cache_read": 3968,16  "cache_write": 017 },18 "cost_usd": 0.047858,19 "request_id": "req_011CggqgU1dCjbFbp3AVf6A9",20 "annotation": {21  "genre": "theoretical",22  "subfield": "corporate_finance",23  "subfield_secondary": "corporate governance / organizational economics (cheap talk, control rights)",24  "primary_method": "theoretical_model_analytical",25  "identification": {26   "estimand": "not applicable (theoretical model)",27   "strategy": "not applicable; equilibrium analysis of a principal-agent cheap-talk model with costly intervention",28   "key_assumptions": [29    "incomplete contracts: actions and messages not contractible",30    "top-down information structure with privately informed principal",31    "cheap talk communication a la Crawford and Sobel",32    "agent biased toward overinvestment",33    "costly intervention by principal"34   ],35   "threats_addressed": [],36   "causal_language_strength": 1,37   "uses_causal_claim": false38  },39  "abstract_moves": {40   "question": {41    "present": true,42    "sentence_index": 143   },44   "gap": {45    "present": false,46    "sentence_index": -147   },48   "method": {49    "present": true,50    "sentence_index": 151   },52   "results": {53    "present": true,54    "sentence_index": 255   },56   "magnitude": {57    "present": false,58    "sentence_index": -159   },60   "contribution": {61    "present": true,62    "sentence_index": 463   }64  },65  "introduction": {66   "moves": [67    {68     "paragraph_index": 0,69     "move": "other"70    },71    {72     "paragraph_index": 1,73     "move": "motivation"74    },75    {76     "paragraph_index": 1,77     "move": "literature_gap"78    },79    {80     "paragraph_index": 1,81     "move": "preview_of_results"82    },83    {84     "paragraph_index": 1,85     "move": "policy_or_broader_implication"86    },87    {88     "paragraph_index": 1,89     "move": "preview_of_approach"90    }91   ],92   "contribution_paragraph_index": 1,93   "contribution_types": [94    "new_theory_or_model"95   ],96   "roadmap_present": false,97   "literature_positioning_location": "inside_introduction"98  },99  "section_roles": [100   {101    "idx": 0,102    "role": "introduction"103   },104   {105    "idx": 1,106    "role": "theory"107   },108   {109    "idx": 2,110    "role": "theory"111   },112   {113    "idx": 3,114    "role": "other"115   },116   {117    "idx": 4,118    "role": "conclusion"119   },120   {121    "idx": 5,122    "role": "appendix"123   }124  ],125  "results_presentation": {126   "economic_significance_discussed": false,127   "statistical_significance_language": "unclear",128   "magnitude_statements_in_intro": false129  },130  "robustness": {131   "location": "main_text_section",132   "types": [133    "other"134   ]135  },136  "tables": {137   "convention_notes": "No tables. Results are stated as propositions, with proofs in Appendix A and additional material in an Internet Appendix. Figures plot numerical examples at stated parameter values.",138   "units_stated_in_notes": false,139   "standard_errors_description": "none"140  },141  "figures": {142   "uncertainty_shown": "no"143  },144  "conclusion": {145   "bounded_claims": false,146   "policy_implications": true,147   "open_questions": false,148   "restates_contribution": true149  },150  "hedging": {151   "level": "low",152   "typical_devices": [153    "conditional statements tied to parameter regions (e.g., low intervention cost, severe agency problem)",154    "modal verbs such as 'can harm' and 'can reduce'"155   ]156  },157  "claim_evidence": [158   {159    "claim": "A principal's power to intervene limits her ability to communicate private information effectively.",160    "evidence_type": "equation_or_proof",161    "evidence_ref": "Section I.C; Appendix A"162   },163   {164    "claim": "Intervention can harm the principal, especially when the intervention cost is low or the agency problem is severe.",165    "evidence_type": "equation_or_proof",166    "evidence_ref": "Section I.D.1; Figure 2"167   },168   {169    "claim": "Welfare effects of intervention on the agent are characterized.",170    "evidence_type": "figure",171    "evidence_ref": "Section I.D.2; Figure 3"172   },173   {174    "claim": "Expected intervention is lower in equilibrium with effective communication than without communication.",175    "evidence_type": "equation_or_proof",176    "evidence_ref": "Internet Appendix Section I.D"177   },178   {179    "claim": "Pay-for-performance contracts alter the principal's welfare from intervention.",180    "evidence_type": "figure",181    "evidence_ref": "Section II.A; Figure 4"182   }183  ],184  "structural_summary": "The paper opens with an epigraph, then motivates the topic with governance practice and notes that the interplay of communication and control is poorly understood. It states the main result and its implications up front, then describes the cheap-talk model. The main Analysis section covers setup, equilibrium, the effect of intervention on communication, and welfare. Extensions relax assumptions: incentive pay, an agent's intervention cost, and an informed agent. The paper then derives testable predictions and applies them to managerial leadership, boards, private equity, and activism. A brief conclusion restates the result, and formal proofs are in the appendix.",185  "writing_profile_keywords": [186   "cheap talk",187   "principal-agent",188   "control rights",189   "intervention",190   "corporate governance",191   "counterintuitive result",192   "propositions and proofs",193   "applications section"194  ],195  "confidence": 0.85,196  "notes": "Pure theory paper. Empirical predictions are offered in Section III but not tested. The introduction excerpt is truncated, so later intro moves (literature positioning, roadmap) are not visible; the roadmap is set to false based on what is visible."197 },198 "deterministic_checks": {199  "roadmap_regex": false,200  "contribution_regex_in_intro": false,201  "magnitude_in_abstract": false,202  "abstract_n_sentences": 5,203  "intro_n_paragraphs": 2,204  "intro_n_words": 231,205  "causal_words_in_abstract": 1,206  "hedge_words_in_abstract": 0,207  "stars_mentioned": false,208  "clustered_se_mentioned": false,209  "internet_appendix_mentioned": true,210  "section_roles_rule": {211   "0": "introduction",212   "1": "other",213   "2": "robustness",214   "3": "other",215   "4": "conclusion",216   "5": "appendix"217  }218 },219 "schema_valid": true,220 "code_version": "87c73cd-dirty"221}
Files · main
Menu

Theme