SPB Git

spb/wp45_uqo

Public
6.7 KB · 227 lines json
1{2 "validation_errors": [],3 "doc_id": "jof_12959",4 "ontology_version": "1.0",5 "prompt_version": "1.0",6 "model": "claude-opus-5-5",7 "effort": "medium",8 "annotated_at": "2026-11-03T23:16:06+00:00",9 "source_sha256": "6daa7ff6013b0a81a05094f2d85285dac3df2ec67ae206bc3c820fd9f3a5b3ec",10 "parser": "pymupdf-jof-heuristics-1.3",11 "payload_chars": 18426,12 "usage": {13  "input": 6314,14  "output": 1811,15  "cache_read": 3968,16  "cache_write": 017 },18 "cost_usd": 0.06227,19 "request_id": "req_011Cggr23eUojpAyvc4DvqGv",20 "annotation": {21  "genre": "mixed_theory_empirical",22  "subfield": "financial_intermediation_banking",23  "subfield_secondary": "international_finance",24  "primary_method": "reduced_form_regression",25  "identification": {26   "estimand": "Effect of the host-home interest rate differential (IOER rates) on a global bank's foreign-currency loan supply",27   "strategy": "Within-borrower and within-syndicate comparison across banks from different currency areas. Borrower-quarter and lender-quarter fixed effects isolate supply responses to IOER differentials. This is complemented by firm-level exposure analysis based on the past share of foreign banks.",28   "key_assumptions": [29    "Borrower-quarter fixed effects absorb time-varying loan demand",30    "Lender-quarter fixed effects absorb home-country shocks to banks",31    "Changes in IOER differentials are not driven by borrower-specific credit conditions"32   ],33   "threats_addressed": [34    "Loan demand confounding",35    "Home-country shocks to bank health (e.g., Japanese banking crisis)"36   ],37   "causal_language_strength": 3,38   "uses_causal_claim": true39  },40  "abstract_moves": {41   "question": {42    "present": true,43    "sentence_index": 044   },45   "gap": {46    "present": true,47    "sentence_index": 148   },49   "method": {50    "present": true,51    "sentence_index": 352   },53   "results": {54    "present": true,55    "sentence_index": 256   },57   "magnitude": {58    "present": false,59    "sentence_index": -160   },61   "contribution": {62    "present": false,63    "sentence_index": -164   }65  },66  "introduction": {67   "moves": [68    {69     "paragraph_index": 0,70     "move": "motivation"71    },72    {73     "paragraph_index": 0,74     "move": "contribution_statement"75    },76    {77     "paragraph_index": 0,78     "move": "mechanism_or_theory_sketch"79    },80    {81     "paragraph_index": 1,82     "move": "preview_of_results"83    },84    {85     "paragraph_index": 1,86     "move": "identification_defense"87    },88    {89     "paragraph_index": 2,90     "move": "preview_of_results"91    },92    {93     "paragraph_index": 3,94     "move": "related_literature_positioning"95    },96    {97     "paragraph_index": 3,98     "move": "literature_gap"99    },100    {101     "paragraph_index": 4,102     "move": "roadmap"103    }104   ],105   "contribution_paragraph_index": 3,106   "contribution_types": [107    "new_theory_or_model",108    "new_evidence"109   ],110   "roadmap_present": true,111   "literature_positioning_location": "inside_introduction"112  },113  "section_roles": [114   {115    "idx": 0,116    "role": "introduction"117   },118   {119    "idx": 1,120    "role": "theory"121   },122   {123    "idx": 2,124    "role": "data"125   },126   {127    "idx": 3,128    "role": "results"129   },130   {131    "idx": 4,132    "role": "conclusion"133   }134  ],135  "results_presentation": {136   "economic_significance_discussed": true,137   "statistical_significance_language": "unclear",138   "magnitude_statements_in_intro": true139  },140  "robustness": {141   "location": "none_seen",142   "types": []143  },144  "tables": {145   "convention_notes": "Table notes define dependent variables, units of observation (bank×currency×quarter, borrower-lender), and units (USD billions, percentage points, percent). The first table lists IOER rate changes by currency area.",146   "units_stated_in_notes": true,147   "standard_errors_description": "unclear"148  },149  "figures": {150   "uncertainty_shown": "unclear"151  },152  "conclusion": {153   "bounded_claims": false,154   "policy_implications": false,155   "open_questions": false,156   "restates_contribution": true157  },158  "hedging": {159   "level": "low",160   "typical_devices": [161    "'tend to' phrasing",162    "'is associated with' for firm-level magnitudes",163    "model-conditional statements ('if capital constrained')"164   ]165  },166  "claim_evidence": [167   {168    "claim": "With limited equity, lower domestic rates raise domestic lending and reduce foreign lending",169    "evidence_type": "equation_or_proof",170    "evidence_ref": "Section I model"171   },172   {173    "claim": "Introduction of IOER led to a large rise in foreign banks' Fed reserve holdings",174    "evidence_type": "figure",175    "evidence_ref": "Figure 1"176   },177   {178    "claim": "A 25bp IOER differential lowers foreign-bank lending probability ~1.6% and volume ~3.6%",179    "evidence_type": "table",180    "evidence_ref": "Table VII"181   },182   {183    "claim": "Firms with a larger past share of foreign banks get fewer and smaller loans after home-country easing",184    "evidence_type": "table",185    "evidence_ref": "Table VIII"186   },187   {188    "claim": "Bank-level foreign currency lending share responds to the IOER difference",189    "evidence_type": "table",190    "evidence_ref": "Table VI"191   }192  ],193  "structural_summary": "The introduction motivates the paper with the scale of global bank activity, then claims a first framework linking monetary policy to loan supply across currencies via capital constraints. It previews bank-firm and firm-level results with magnitudes and defends identification through fixed effects. It positions the paper against the internal capital markets literature and closes with a roadmap. A simple analytical model derives testable hypotheses. Data from Call Reports, BIS and DealScan feed results that move from aggregate US and cross-country evidence to bank-, loan- and borrower-level regressions. The conclusion restates that spillovers run opposite to the internal markets view.",194  "writing_profile_keywords": [195   "model-then-test",196   "capital constraint mechanism",197   "syndicated loans",198   "fixed effects identification",199   "cross-border spillovers",200   "contrarian to existing view"201  ],202  "confidence": 0.8,203  "notes": "Standard error treatment and robustness checks are not visible in the excerpts. Significance conventions are unclear."204 },205 "deterministic_checks": {206  "roadmap_regex": true,207  "contribution_regex_in_intro": true,208  "magnitude_in_abstract": false,209  "abstract_n_sentences": 4,210  "intro_n_paragraphs": 5,211  "intro_n_words": 833,212  "causal_words_in_abstract": 0,213  "hedge_words_in_abstract": 0,214  "stars_mentioned": false,215  "clustered_se_mentioned": false,216  "internet_appendix_mentioned": false,217  "section_roles_rule": {218   "0": "introduction",219   "1": "theory",220   "2": "data",221   "3": "results",222   "4": "conclusion"223  }224 },225 "schema_valid": true,226 "code_version": "87c73cd-dirty"227}
Files · main
Menu

Theme