Model card — fiaparch11 (FIAPARCH(1,d,1), fractionally integrated APARCH) — post-registration extension
1. Identity
- model_id:
fiaparch11· family: fractional · tier: A · status: extension (E-01, added 2026-11-09 after the protocol freeze; scored with the frozen protocol, reported separately as exploratory) · impl: custom (src/wp46/models/extensions.py::FIAPARCH11) - Label: FIAPARCH(1,d,1) · distributions: normal, t (registry
dists; the class also accepts ged/skewt but those pairs are not scored) - Seminal citation:
tse1998conditional - Other references:
ding1993long(APARCH, scored asaparch11),baillie1996fractionally(FIGARCH, the δ = 2, γ = 0 case, scored asfigarch11),conrad2006inequality(positivity of FIGARCH weights),davidson2004moment(HYGARCH, same weight machinery),sheppard2025arch(truncation convention). This card replaces the former unsupported stub.
2. Definition (as coded)
$$r_t = \mu + \varepsilon_t,\quad \varepsilon_t = \sigma_t z_t,\qquad \sigma_t^{\delta} = \frac{\omega}{1-\beta} + \sum_{k=1}^{1000}\lambda_k,\big(|\varepsilon_{t-k}| - \gamma,\varepsilon_{t-k}\big)^{\delta},\qquad
\lambda(L) = 1 - (1-\beta L)^{-1}(1-\phi L)(1-L)^{d},$$
i.e. tse1998conditional written as $(1-\beta L)\sigma_t^\delta = \omega + [(1-\beta L) - (1-\phi L)(1-L)^d],(|\varepsilon_t| - \gamma\varepsilon_t)^\delta$ and expanded into the truncated ARCH(∞) form with the FIGARCH weights of figarch_weights(d, φ, β, amp = 1, 1000) (hygarch11.md §2). Recursion rec_fiaparch: pre-sample $(|\varepsilon| - \gamma\varepsilon)^\delta$ replaced by $s_0^{\delta/2}$ (the backcast raised to δ/2, as arch's APARCH backcast_transform) for all 1,000 lags; $\sigma_t^\delta$ floored at 1e-12; the variance returned is $(\sigma_t^\delta)^{2/\delta}$. Innovations: standardised normal or Student-t.
3. Parameter space and admissibility
- Parameters:
mu, omega, d, phi, beta, gamma, delta(+nufor t). - Reparameterisation: $\omega = e^{\theta_0}$; $d, \phi, \beta = \sigma(\cdot) \in (0,1)$; $\gamma = 0.99\tanh(\theta_4) \in (-0.99, 0.99)$; $\delta = 0.5 + 3.5,\sigma(\theta_5) \in (0.5, 4)$.
- Admissibility: $\omega > 0$ and all 1,000 truncated weights $\lambda_k \ge -10^{-10}$ (numerical check; a negative weight inside the likelihood returns the 1e10 penalty, a hard wall — see
hygarch11.md§3). Positivity of $\sigma_t^\delta$ then follows from $(|\varepsilon| - \gamma\varepsilon)^\delta \ge 0$ for $|\gamma| < 1$. No stationarity flag: like FIGARCH, the process has an infinite unconditional variance for d > 0.
4. Nesting and relations
- δ = 2, γ = 0: FIGARCH(1,d,1) exactly (same weights;
figarch11is the registry twin) — inequality-tested, §7. - d → 0: APARCH(1,1) with $\alpha = \phi - \beta$ (
aparch11; the limit is excluded by $d = \sigma(\theta)$). - δ = 1: a fractionally integrated TARCH/AVGARCH (
tarch11,avgarch11are the d = 0 analogues); γ > 0 raises the response to negative shocks (ding1993longsign convention). hygarch11shares the weight machinery (with the amplitude parameter);fiegarch11is the log-variance analogue.
5. Estimation
Shared custom MLE (CustomModel.fit): L-BFGS-B (maxiter 2000, ftol 1e-10, gtol 1e-6) from up to three starts (ω, d, φ, β, γ, δ) ∈ {(0.1v, 0.4, 0.2, 0.5, 0.1, 2.0), (0.1v^{0.75}, 0.5, 0.1, 0.4, 0.2, 1.5), (0.2v, 0.3, 0.3, 0.6, 0.0, 2.0)}, v = sample variance of the demeaned window; μ start = sample mean; ν start 6; stop after the second start if converged; Nelder–Mead polish (maxiter 4000) + final L-BFGS-B if not converged or stalled; A-05 floor vs GARCH(1,1) with the same law (−50 units → two perturbed restarts → degenerate flag). Backcast $s_0$ = exponentially weighted mean (75 lags, 0.94) of the first squared demeaned returns. Each likelihood evaluation recomputes the 1,000 weights and the O(T × 1000) convolution of the power-transformed innovations. Point estimates only.
6. Forecasting
FIAPARCH11.step_forecast (method simulation): future $(|\varepsilon| - \gamma\varepsilon)^\delta$ are not linear in $\sigma^2$, so 2,000 paths are simulated: each path keeps the last 1,000 transformed innovations (pre-window lags padded with $\sigma_0^{\delta}$), computes $\sigma^\delta_{t+k} = \omega/(1-\beta) + \sum_i\lambda_i g_{t+k-i}$ (floor 1e-12), $\sigma^2 = (\sigma^\delta)^{2/\delta}$, draws $z$ from the fitted law (rvs, seeded), forms $\varepsilon = \sigma z$ and shifts $(|\varepsilon| - \gamma\varepsilon)^\delta$ into the history; forecast = cross-path mean of $\sigma^2_{t+k}$ (the k = 1 value is deterministic). Cumulative h-day variance = sum of the first h steps. Same treatment as aparch11 (arch simulates), extended to the 1,000-lag memory.
7. Implementation and verification
src/wp46/models/extensions.py::FIAPARCH11,figarch_weights, numbarec_fiaparch; dispatched throughEXTENSIONS.- Tests (
tests/unit/test_extensions.py::test_fiaparch_nests_figarch_and_stgarch_nests_garch): the FIAPARCH-t fit on the simulated GARCH-t fixture converges with log-likelihood ≥ arch's FIGARCH-t log-likelihood − 1.0 (nesting inequality only; no evaluation of the FIAPARCH likelihood at the FIGARCH point — the amp = 1 identity is tested forhygarch11only, and FIAPARCH(δ = 2, γ = 0) uses the same weights and recursion up to the power transform). Not covered bytest_no_lookahead_extensions. - No external-package cross-check (FIAPARCH is not in arch 8.0.0 — arch's
FIGARCH(power=…)is a symmetric power FIGARCH — nor in rugarch 1.5-6), no simulation-recovery test. CLAUDE.md rule 6 is not met — henceextensionstatus.
8. Known limitations / failure modes
Post-registration, exploratory. Seven to eight parameters with a 1,000-lag memory in a 1,000-day window: δ, γ, d and ω trade off (the literature matrix calls it "heavy to estimate"); the positivity wall makes the likelihood discontinuous; the pre-sample backcast $s_0^{\delta/2}$ implicitly assumes $E(|z| - \gamma z)^\delta = 1$ (as arch's APARCH); δ ∈ (0.5, 4) and |γ| < 0.99 are imposed by construction (literature: δ > 0, |γ| < 1); d, φ, β ∈ (0,1) exclude the APARCH/GARCH limits; simulation noise at h ≥ 2; infinite unconditional variance makes long-horizon forecasts grow slowly without bound; the FIGARCH arch-vs-rugarch gap of −1.47 (D-14) is inherited by the weight convention.
9. Computational footprint
O(T × 1000) per likelihood evaluation plus the O(1000) weight construction and a power transform per observation; simulation forecasts are O(2000 × 22 × 1000) per origin — qualitatively 10–30× slower than GARCH(1,1) for the fit and the most expensive forecast of the extension set. Not timed in the pilot.
10. Literature expectations
tse1998conditional applied FIAPARCH to the yen–dollar rate (long memory and asymmetry jointly significant); ding1993long motivate the power transform; conrad2006inequality and lamoureux1990persistence/hillebrand2005neglecting qualify long-memory evidence; hansen2005forecast find no gain of FIGARCH-type models over GARCH(1,1) at h = 1. Under H1 and H4 the expectation is a gain limited to equity instruments at h = 22, if any, and under H5 one of the highest failure rates in the benchmark.