SPB Git

spb/wp29_uqo

Public

# Verification checks (2026-10-30)

# check outcome
1 Clean re-run (rm results.json; run twice) gives identical SHA-256 (d41b75df…ae4) PASS
2 n_supported+n_not_supported+n_not_assessable = 6 = n_analysed = len(assertions) (2+3+1) PASS
3 Every verdict in allowed set; one locator per assertion in the required form PASS
4 Input SHA-256 match data/README.md and bundle.json PASS
5 n_input_rows equals wc -l (README 14, DCR 134, RESEA 58) and JSON item count 6 PASS
6 A1: 100(exp(-0.431)-1) = -35.01% matches printed -35.0%; t=-2.05 consistent with ** PASS
7 A3: 100(exp(-0.283)-1) = -24.65% matches printed -24.7% (source internally consistent) PASS
8 A4: CI contains estimate (-0.896 < -0.406 < 0.084); width check: 1.96 SE CI includes 0 under 1.96 and 2.0 PASS
9 A6: 1.99/17.3 = 11.50%; ATE CI [-2.24,-1.75] contains -1.99; Table 3 col 1 duplicates it PASS
10 A5: regex search for men/women/male/female/sex/gender in DCR extract returns no lines PASS
11 Baseline (naive verbatim-number match) agrees on 4/6; disagreements A2 (sign ignored) and A5 (no numbers) are explained by baseline's blindness to sign and to absent subgroups PASS (expected)
12 Internal source inconsistencies (Table 6 vs A19 SE; 608 vs 640 controls) recorded in data_issues; A1 robust PASS (reported)
Files · 452964ee0fbbaa40fbbed2c87a54ca798ffd6a85
Menu

Theme