1# Verification checks (2026-10-30)2| # | check | outcome |3|---|---|---|4| 1 | Clean re-run (rm results.json; run twice) gives identical SHA-256 (d41b75df…ae4) | PASS |5| 2 | n_supported+n_not_supported+n_not_assessable = 6 = n_analysed = len(assertions) (2+3+1) | PASS |6| 3 | Every verdict in allowed set; one locator per assertion in the required form | PASS |7| 4 | Input SHA-256 match data/README.md and bundle.json | PASS |8| 5 | n_input_rows equals `wc -l` (README 14, DCR 134, RESEA 58) and JSON item count 6 | PASS |9| 6 | A1: 100(exp(-0.431)-1) = -35.01% matches printed -35.0%; t=-2.05 consistent with ** | PASS |10| 7 | A3: 100(exp(-0.283)-1) = -24.65% matches printed -24.7% (source internally consistent) | PASS |11| 8 | A4: CI contains estimate (-0.896 < -0.406 < 0.084); width check: 1.96 SE CI includes 0 under 1.96 and 2.0 | PASS |12| 9 | A6: 1.99/17.3 = 11.50%; ATE CI [-2.24,-1.75] contains -1.99; Table 3 col 1 duplicates it | PASS |13| 10 | A5: regex search for men/women/male/female/sex/gender in DCR extract returns no lines | PASS |14| 11 | Baseline (naive verbatim-number match) agrees on 4/6; disagreements A2 (sign ignored) and A5 (no numbers) are explained by baseline's blindness to sign and to absent subgroups | PASS (expected) |15| 12 | Internal source inconsistencies (Table 6 vs A19 SE; 608 vs 640 controls) recorded in data_issues; A1 robust | PASS (reported) |16