1{2 "task_id": "F5-conf-01",3 "price_ratio_p1_over_p2": 0.8749999999999999,4 "x1_A": 4.114285714285715,5 "x2_A": 5.3999999999999995,6 "x1_B": 7.885714285714286,7 "x2_B": 4.6000000000000005,8 "excess_demand_good1": 0.0,9 "excess_demand_good2": 0.0,10 "walras_law_residual": 0.0,11 "walras_law_residual_offeq_max_abs": 7.105427357601002e-15,12 "aggregate_endowment_good1": 12.0,13 "aggregate_endowment_good2": 10.0,14 "aggregate_endowment_good1_recorded": 14.0,15 "aggregate_endowment_good2_recorded": 10.0,16 "price_ratio_numerical": 0.8749999999999998,17 "price_abs_diff_closed_vs_numerical": 1.1102230246251565e-16,18 "alpha_A": 0.4,19 "alpha_B": 0.6,20 "feasibility": "complete",21 "feasibility_reason": null,22 "data_issues": [23 {24 "issue": "parameters.csv aggregate_endowment_good1 = 14.0 does not equal the sum of individual endowments in endowments.csv (12.0); discrepancy +2.",25 "handling": "Used the sum of the primary per-agent endowments (12.0) in the market-clearing condition; the summary-sheet value 14.0 was not used. Clearing against 14.0 would be inconsistent with the agents' budget constraints (Walras' law would fail by p*(-2))."26 }27 ],28 "n_input_rows": {29 "endowments.csv": 2,30 "parameters.csv": 431 },32 "n_analysed": 2,33 "random_seed": null34}