1# Data audit (P1)2| file | SHA-256 | wc -l / items | matches README/bundle hash |3|---|---|---|---|4| data/assertions.json | 2965ab3acc6f326653169b83a5345698b51fac88a556de65faf89210aea0cad4 | 6 top-level items (fields id, cites, text) | yes (bundle) |5| data/README.md | 5348bd49912099735108dbbe19ae09fa72bd600cb3d12b878658e6b9806198a7 | 14 lines | yes (bundle) |6| data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt | ee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b | 134 lines | yes (README) |7| data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt | 27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 | 58 lines | yes (README) |89No duplicate assertion ids (A1–A6); A1–A5 cite arxiv-2609.27732v1, A6 cites arxiv-2606.14621v1. No missing fields. Units: DCR outcomes in log hospitalisation rates per 100,000 (ATTs in log points); RESEA weeks on UI in weeks.1011## Anomalies / internal inconsistencies found in the sources121. DCR Table A19 prints the CS-DR 5 km ATT -0.431** with SE (0.218), while Table 6 prints the same estimate with SE (0.210).132. DCR Table A19 note says 640 never-treated comparison regions; Table A19 body, Table 6 and Figure 6 note say 608.143. DCR abstract says fatal hospitalisations "fall by 35%"; Table 7 5 km fatal ATT is -0.354 log points = -29.8%, and Section 6.1 says "approximately 30%".154. DCR Section 6 text says HIV estimates are "close to zero", while Table 7 HIV at 3 km/5 km are -0.239/-0.340 (insignificant but not small).165. RESEA results text prints the weeks-on-UI CI as magnitudes "[1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]" while Table 2 prints signed [-2.24, -1.75] — consistent up to sign convention.176. RESEA line 39 rendering defect "p ¡ 0.001" (evidently p < 0.001).18None of these violate the information-availability rules; all inputs are admissible. Handling: tables are treated as the primary locator; issues recorded in results.json data_issues.19