1{2 "harmonised": {3 "E1": {4 "value": -35.01,5 "unit": "percent (relative change vs counterfactual rate)",6 "transformation": "100*(exp(-0.431) - 1) = -35.0141% (exact conversion of a log-point coefficient; matches the printed '% change' -35.0%)",7 "harmonisable": true,8 "missing_quantity": null,9 "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row 'ATT' | column '5 km' (extract line 36); cross-check: row '% change', column '5 km' (line 40)"10 },11 "E2": {12 "value": 1.96,13 "unit": "percent (relative to the control-group mean reemployment rate)",14 "transformation": "100*1.47 pp / 75.0% = 1.9600% (exact given the definition; denominator = raw control-group mean)",15 "harmonisable": true,16 "missing_quantity": null,17 "locator": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2 | row 'Reemployment' | column 'Average treatment effect estimate' (1.47 pp) and column 'Control' (75.0%) (extract line 29)"18 },19 "E3": {20 "value": -1.82,21 "unit": "percent (relative change in employment)",22 "transformation": "100*(-0.388)*(0.047) = -1.8236% (first-order/linear approximation; g = printed '% MW changes' = 0.047, i.e. 4.7%)",23 "harmonisable": true,24 "missing_quantity": null,25 "locator": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 | Table 2 | row 'Employment elasticity w.r.t MW' | column 'Estimate (SE)' (line 50); row '% MW changes' | column 'Estimate (SE)' (line 60)"26 },27 "E4": {28 "value": null,29 "unit": "hospitalisations per 100,000 inhabitants per year",30 "transformation": "absolute change = R0*(exp(-0.354) - 1), where R0 is the counterfactual (pre-treatment/baseline) fatal drug-related hospitalisation rate per 100,000 in the treated (5 km) regions; the relative part is exp(-0.354)-1 = -0.2981 (-29.81%), but R0 is not printed in the extract, so the target cannot be reached",31 "harmonisable": false,32 "missing_quantity": "baseline (counterfactual / pre-treatment) level of the fatal drug-related hospitalisation rate per 100,000 inhabitants per year in the treated 5 km regions (not printed in the extract)",33 "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row 'Drug-related (fatal)' | column '5 km' (extract line 86)"34 },35 "E5": {36 "value": -9.62,37 "unit": "percentage points",38 "transformation": "100*(-0.0962) = -9.62 pp (exact rescaling from 0-1 probability scale)",39 "harmonisable": true,40 "missing_quantity": null,41 "locator": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 | Table 3 | row 'Treatment' | column '(4)' (extract line 49)"42 }43 },44 "n_harmonised": 4,45 "n_not_harmonisable": 1,46 "task_id": "F4-conf-03",47 "feasibility": "complete",48 "feasibility_reason": null,49 "data_issues": [50 {51 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: the abstract states fatal drug-related hospitalisations 'fall by 35%', but the Table 7 5 km coefficient -0.354 log points implies 100*(exp(-0.354)-1) = -29.8%; Section 6.1 says 'approximately 30%'. The abstract figure appears to conflate the overall effect (-35.0%) or log points with percent.",52 "handling": "Used the Table 7 coefficient as instructed; E4 is not harmonisable anyway (missing level). Flagged."53 },54 {55 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: the 5 km CS-DR ATT -0.431 has SE (0.210) in Table 6 but (0.218) in Table A19; Table 6/7 report 608 control regions while the A19 note says 640 never-treated comparison regions.",56 "handling": "Point estimates agree (-0.431); SEs not used (no uncertainty propagation). Flagged only."57 },58 {59 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Section 6 text describes 'five diagnostic sub-categories' while the Figure 7 note mentions four; the Table 7 note lists four ICD sub-outcome groups and gives no definition for the 'Drug-related (fatal)' row.",60 "handling": "Did not affect the E1/E4 harmonisation; flagged."61 },62 {63 "issue": "arxiv-2505.04555v3: the Table 2 note describes the 2023 changes as 'about 4% minimum wage increase', while the table row '% MW changes' prints 0.047 (4.7%).",64 "handling": "Used the printed table value 0.047 as the target definition requires ('size of that increase as printed in the same table'); with 0.04 the result would be -1.55%."65 },66 {67 "issue": "arxiv-2510.03658v1: Section 4.1 refers to 'table 2' and a coefficient -0.0855 with dependent mean 0.455 (headline 18.79%), which is not in the extract; the Table 3 column (4) '% Change' prints -0.3685 whereas -0.0962/0.261 = -0.3686 (rounding difference in the last digit).",68 "handling": "Used Table 3 column (4) as specified in effects.json; flagged."69 },70 {71 "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: the abstract rounds the reemployment ATE to 1.5 pp versus 1.47 pp in Table 2; the control mean 75.0% is the raw (not block-adjusted) group mean.",72 "handling": "Used the Table 2 printed values 1.47 pp and 75.0% as the target definition specifies the control-group mean."73 }74 ],75 "n_input_rows": {76 "effects.json": 5,77 "README.md": 16,78 "arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt": 66,79 "arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt": 91,80 "arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58,81 "arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 13482 },83 "n_analysed": 5,84 "random_seed": null85}