spb/wp7_uqo Public
UQO Working Paper No. 7 — Options-implied information for cross-asset return and volatility prediction: evidence from 3.8B option contracts.
Python 66.5%
TeX 32.7%
Makefile 0.8%
1% =============================================================================2% Author: Simon-Pierre Boucher3% Contact: contact@spboucher.ai4% =============================================================================5% Appendix6% =============================================================================78\section{Implied Correlation Around Crises}\label{app:crises}910Table~\ref{tab:app_crises} details the behavior of the implied-correlation index around the nine major market events of the sample period. Implied correlation rises after every event, with the largest jumps around Volmageddon ($+0.328$) and the August 2015 China devaluation ($+0.258$).1112\begin{table}[H]13\centering14\caption{Implied correlation around major market events.}15\label{tab:app_crises}16\begin{threeparttable}17\small18\begin{tabular}{@{}ld{1.3}d{1.3}d{1.3}@{}}19\toprule20Crisis & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Pre IC} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Post IC} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta$IC} \\21\midrule22Flash Crash (May 2010) & 0.223 & 0.404 & +0.181 \\23Euro Crisis (Aug 2011) & 0.313 & 0.469 & +0.156 \\24China Deval.\ (Aug 2015) & 0.231 & 0.489 & +0.258 \\25Volmageddon (Feb 2018) & 0.108 & 0.436 & +0.328 \\26COVID-19 (Mar 2020) & 0.473 & 0.648 & +0.175 \\27Meme Stocks (Jan 2021) & 0.228 & 0.326 & +0.098 \\28Rate Shock (Jun 2022) & 0.417 & 0.447 & +0.030 \\29SVB Crisis (Mar 2023) & 0.328 & 0.373 & +0.045 \\30VIX Spike (Aug 2024) & 0.138 & 0.316 & +0.178 \\31\bottomrule32\end{tabular}33\begin{tablenotes}[flushleft]\footnotesize34\item \textit{Notes.} IC = Implied Correlation. Pre = 30-day window before the event; Post = 10-day window after.35\end{tablenotes}36\end{threeparttable}37\end{table}383940\section{SPX Options Surface Features (RQ5)}\label{app:features}4142The 21 SPX surface features used in Section~\ref{sec:results} are: $IV_{ATM}$ at six tenors (1w, 2w, 1m, 2m, 3m, 6m); 25$\delta$ skew (1m, 3m); 10$\delta$ deep OTM skew (1m); butterfly ratio (1m); term-structure slopes (3m$-$1m, 6m$-$1m); total gamma\,$\times$\,OI; net gamma; total vega\,$\times$\,OI; average $\Theta$; put-call volume ratio; put-call OI ratio; total option volume; total OI; and the average bid-ask spread percentage.4344\section{Random Forest Feature Importance (RQ5)}\label{app:importance}4546Table~\ref{tab:app_importance} reports the full Random Forest importance ranking underlying the RQ5 discussion; the two shortest ATM tenors jointly account for two thirds of total importance.4748\begin{table}[H]49\centering50\caption{Random Forest feature importance (1-day RV target, 2010--2019 training).}51\label{tab:app_importance}52\begin{threeparttable}53\begin{tabular}{@{}lr@{}}54\toprule55Feature & Importance \\56\midrule57$IV_{ATM,2w}$ & 0.508 \\58$IV_{ATM,1w}$ & 0.151 \\59Total option volume & 0.083 \\60PC vol.\ ratio & 0.067 \\61Net gamma exposure & 0.037 \\62$IV_{ATM,1m}$ & 0.023 \\63$RV_{weekly}$ & 0.022 \\64Skew (25$\delta$, 3m)& 0.013 \\65Avg.\ $\Theta$ & 0.012 \\66$IV_{ATM,2m}$ & 0.011 \\67\midrule68\textit{All others (14 features)} & \textit{0.073} \\69\bottomrule70\end{tabular}71\end{threeparttable}72\end{table}737475\section{Forecast Error Variance Decomposition}\label{app:fevd}7677Table~\ref{tab:app_fevd} reports the full horizon profile of the forecast error variance decomposition summarized in Section~\ref{sec:results}: the share of realized-variance forecast error variance attributable to implied-volatility shocks rises monotonically from zero on impact to 73.8\% at 20 days.7879\begin{table}[H]80\centering81\caption{FEVD: share of RV forecast error variance explained by IV shocks (\%).}82\label{tab:app_fevd}83\begin{threeparttable}84\begin{tabular}{@{}rcc@{}}85\toprule86Horizon (days) & IV shocks (\%) & RV shocks (\%) \\87\midrule88 1 & 0.0 & 100.0 \\89 2 & 28.0 & 72.0 \\90 5 & 56.1 & 43.9 \\9110 & 66.4 & 33.6 \\9215 & 71.1 & 28.9 \\9320 & 73.8 & 26.2 \\94\bottomrule95\end{tabular}96\begin{tablenotes}[flushleft]\footnotesize97\item \textit{Notes.} From the bivariate VAR(5) in standardized ATM IV and RV, averaged across 20 tickers.98\end{tablenotes}99\end{threeparttable}100\end{table}101